Publications
Search and Filter Fields
Type into the field below to perform a live search and/or apply filters via the button provided.
14 Publications found…
-
Briefing Paper 19 February 2025
Regulatory cooperation through trade: Trends, challenges and recommendations for middle-power countries
By Jiyeong Go, Emily Lydgate, Andrew Lang, Minako Morita Jaeger, Joris Hoste, Nicolò Tamberi and Bernard Hoekman et al.
View postSummary CITP publication
This Briefing Paper discusses the challenge for middle-power countries in global trade governance and explores institutional factors that facilitate successful dialogue on industrial policy and trade.
Topics
-
Working Paper 3 February 2025
International financial openness and manufacturing productivity: A services trade perspective
By Bernard Hoekman, Matteo Fiorini and Dennis Quinn et al.
View postSummary CITP publication
In this paper, the authors investigate the relationship between productivity in manufacturing sectors and restrictions affecting the ability to pay for cross-border imports of services and inward investment.
Topics
-
Academic Paper 30 April 2024
Discretion and public procurement outcomes in Europe
By Bernard Hoekman and Bedri Kamil Onur Taş et al.
View postSummary CITP publication
Public procurement regulations aim to ensure the state minimizes contract award prices by specifying the processes to be used in issuing calls for tenders and award of contracts. Cost minimization goals may be complemented by ancillary objectives such as supporting small firms or disadvantaged groups. Recent theory suggests procurement regulations and practices constraining the ability to exercise discretion in awarding contracts may increase average procurement costs. Using detailed data on procurement awards in 33 European countries, we find that restrictions on exercise of discretion are associated with higher average contract prices, and that increases in prices are greater in countries with above average government effectiveness. We also show that realizing price-reducing benefits from exercising greater discretion, where permitted by law, reduces the probability small firms win contracts and continue to do so. Our findings point to a tradeoff between the potential to lower prices by exercising discretion and policies that aim to increase the likelihood SMEs are awarded contracts.
Topics
-
Working Paper 11 October 2023
Digital Trade, Data Protection and EU Adequacy Decisions
By Bernard Hoekman, Filippo Santi, Martina Ferracane and Erik van der Marel et al.
View postSummary CITP publication
Using a structural gravity model, we assess whether EU adequacy decisions on data protection are associated with bilateral digital trade. We find that countries that obtained EU adequacy exhibit an increase in digital trade and trade more with each other.
Topics
-
Working Paper 9 October 2023
Discretion and Public Procurement Outcomes in Europe
By Bernard Hoekman and Bedri Kamil Onur Taş et al.
View postSummary CITP publication
This paper shows that realizing efficiency benefits from exercising greater discretion where permitted by law reduces the probability small firms win contracts and continue to do so, pointing to a tradeoff between the potential cost reduction benefits of exercising discretion and other goals of procurement policy.
Topics
-
Academic Paper 10 September 2023
Trade and Sustainable Development: Non-Economic Objectives in the Theory of Economic Policy
By Bernard Hoekman et al.
View postSummary CITP publication
While the theory of economic policy offers a potential framework for thinking about the joint pursuit of economic objectives (EOs) and non-economic objectives (NEOs), over time the theory of economic policy was formalized in a way that considers NEOs as constraints that are given, rather than as goals that may themselves be endogenous alongside EOs. We examine the analytical treatment of NEOs as co-determined with EOs, revisiting some of the ground broken by Alan Winters in his analysis of NEOs. We review the place of NEOs in the theory of economic policy, discuss current practice in the representation of such objectives as exogenous constraints, and develop an argument for representation of NEOs as objectives in themselves.
Topics
-
Academic Paper 8 September 2023
Noneconomic Objectives, Global Value Chains and International Cooperation
By Bernard Hoekman et al.
View postSummary CITP publication
Systemic conflicts increasingly affect the global value chains (GVCs) underpinning globalization by creating policy uncertainty and politicizing trade and investment decisions. Unilateral policies to attain competitiveness and noneconomic objectives (NEOs), including national security, create incentives for international cooperation to attenuate policy spillovers. Recent initiatives seeking to do so are organized around supply chain governance and need not be anchored in trade agreements. Whether such cooperation is feasible and can be designed to be effective in realizing NEOs is unclear. Plurilateral GVC-centered cooperation offers a potential path for states to pursue NEOs and reduce policy uncertainty for international business. Research offers little guidance to policymakers on the design of such cooperation. A key open question is to determine whether explicit market access commitments are necessary to sustain cooperation. Creating mechanisms for the epistemic communities that are concerned with a specific NEO or policy area to interact with stakeholders and lead firms operating international production networks can help inform the design of cooperation to attain NEOs more efficiently.
Topics
-
Book 25 June 2023
Beyond Trade: How deep trade agreements shape non-trade outcomes
By L. Alan Winters CB and Bernard Hoekman et al.
View postSummary CITP publication
Trade agreements increasingly include disciplines aimed at achieving non-trade objectives: promoting FDI, technology transfers, workers’ movements, but also improving labor conditions, environmental quality and achieving other broader social goals. This eBook brings together a group of leading economists to investigate the economic rationale for including nontrade objectives in trade agreements and whether these disciplines actually achieve their intended goals. Includes chapters by L. Alan Winters on 'Trade agreements and non-trade objectives: A cautionary note' and Bernard Hoekman, with Mavroidis and Nelson on 'FTAs vs. other forms of regulatory cooperation'.
Topics
-
Academic Paper 28 May 2023
Geopolitical competition, globalisation and WTO reform
By Bernard Hoekman et al.
View postSummary CITP publication
This paper discusses options to manage spillovers of unilateral trade policies motivated by national security and other non-economic objectives on global trade and investment. Within the WTO framework, we argue a ‘specific trade concern’ mechanism is likely to be more effective than dispute settlement to address national security-motivated trade intervention. More broadly, we propose creation of a platform for governments, supported by relevant international organisations, to enhance transparency and assess the effectiveness and magnitude of the spillover effects of trade/related policies of systemic import. This would serve to help identify efficient instruments to achieve economic and non-economic goals and inform WTO reform discussions on subsidies and discriminatory trade policies. Plurilateral cooperation among like-minded nations offers a pragmatic pathway to address spillover effects of policies to achieve security and other non-economic objectives but requires a stronger governance framework to ensure consistency with an open multilateral trading system.
Topics
-
Academic Paper 20 July 2022
Plurilateral Cooperation as an Alternative to Trade Agreements: Innovating One Domain at a Time
By Bernard Hoekman et al.
View postSummary Pre-CITP publication
At the end of 2017, different groups of WTO members decided to launch talks on four subjects, setting aside the WTO consensus working practice. This paper argues that these ‘joint statement initiatives’ (JSIs) should seek to establish open plurilateral agreements (OPAs) even in instances where the outcome can be incorporated into existing schedules of commitments of participating WTO members. Designing agreements as OPAs provides an institutional framework for collaboration among the responsible national authorities, transparency, mutual review and learning, as well as alternatives to default WTO dispute settlement procedures which may not be appropriate for supporting cooperation on the matters addressed by the JSIs. In parallel, WTO members should establish enforceable multilateral principles to ensure OPAs are compatible with an open global trade regime.
Topics