Evidence

General Terms for the UK-US Economic Prosperity Deal

Published 25 July 2025

In response to this inquiry by the International Agreements Committee, our evidence reviews the impact of this deal including its implications to the UK’s future trade relationships, compatibility with WTO rules and how Parliament can assess the value and scrutinise future agreements of this nature. Our key points include: While the UK seeks short-term gains through flexible, non-binding agreements like the EPD, such deals risk undermining the global rules-based trading system. This approach could lead to increased economic conflict and supply chain disruptions, particularly as preferential arrangements (e.g., for US ethanol) affect other partners. The UK, as a smaller economy, would be better served by upholding multilateral principles, including legal enforceability and non-discrimination. Aligning too closely with the US—especially on supply chain security and China-related trade controls—could damage relations with other key partners, including the EU.

Author Profiles

Achyuth Anil

View profile

Ingo Borchert

Research Theme Lead for 'People, Firms and Places'

View profile

Peter Holmes

View profile

Headshot of Emily Lydgate

Emily Lydgate

Deputy Director

View profile

Minako Morita Jaeger headshot

Minako Morita Jaeger

View profile

Headshot of Sunayana Sasmal

Sunayana Sasmal

Guest Author

View profile

Headshot of Maurizio Zanardi

Maurizio Zanardi

Guest Author

View profile